In these times of cutbacks, downsizing and restructuring of expenditures, in order to remain viable, everyone is looking for the best ways to manage the staffing issue, as it relates to the bottom line. The news regularly reports that literally hundreds of firms are laying off workers, consolidating jobs and reducing hours to manage overhead. While these measures may seem logical, they often have a serious backlash effect that can actually reduce business in the key areas of ticket average and customer loyalty.
Yet, there are firms that are taking a fresh look at some better ways to control and even improve staffing, distribution of workloads and bottom line profit. Companies that are finding the best return on their investments are focusing on two critical business elements. And those may not be what you think.
It makes sense that firms conserve on overhead wherever possible and a common reaction to that need is to cut costs in the areas that can be streamlined. Salaries are often the first target, and so there begins the strategy of reducing overhead by laying off staff. The flawed logic here is that the same amount of work may be able to be done by fewer people. Commonly, the ones who are released, outsourced, laid off or terminated are those who are making the most money in salary and benefits, since the logic is that fewer people will have to go, in order to make the numbers that way.
That logic could not be more wrong, for several reasons.
In many cases, the staff with the most complete knowledge of the work and the procedures to get it done right are exactly those who may be making a larger salary or hourly wage. While downsizing those people may save money in the short term, the workers who have to take up the slack of those highly qualified people may be those who are the least capable of doing so, while maintaining the work they were already tasked with doing. The result is often more stress in the workplace, more mistakes, cramped deadlines, lower customer satisfaction, slower work pace and reduced efficiency. All of these lead to lower sales and profits.
Companies that are making the best gains, or suffering the least losses, are those that take the approach of investing in their people in two key areas: Training and development of staff and management, and using the guidelines of lean business practices to wring the greatest efficiency out of their operations.
This has to start at the top and flow our through the entire organization if it’s going to work.
One global, northwest-based retail sports gear company did a brilliant job of finding the right path. The key c-level team took a look at ways to reduce overhead and increase profitability, but, instead of just cutting staff, they re-organized the map of the company. They looked at all of the divisions and identified those with the best track record for success, and those where business had fallen off and goals were not being met. For each division, they further identified what functions were necessary within the division and only then did they begin to make staff adjustments. Their strategy was to look across the firm, in all divisions, and choose the best talent for each position, regardless of where that talent had been assigned. If they could fill a position with the right individual from in-house, they did. Staff reductions were engaged when all positions were filled with the best people, and they concurrently began to hire from outside for those positions left to fill.
The result was a much leaner organization, yet one that retained a large percentage of higher-salaried key players, because they were the right people for the job. The company was still able to reduce their overhead significantly without making sacrifices in customer satisfaction or increasing errors in process.
That is a win, in any language.
In an economy where every dollar spent is carefully weighed and even more carefully released, by budget-conscious consumers, there are very few products or services that are unique and necessary at the same time. Right down the street is another store front, selling similar products or services, at competitive prices. The art of the deal is being practiced by your competition, and the ability to convert every new customer to a repeat customer is not dependent on price, but on something even more precious to the client: Service.
Sam Walton said, the Golden Rule of Customer Service is “Treat every customer as if he or she is the boss. They can literally hire or fire you, simply by taking their business somewhere else.” Firms that invest in training their people are winning across the board, in these frugal times. Along with smart advertising, a well-trained, knowledgeable and professional staff is the best possible hedge against lean times. Consumer research bears out that customers are many times more likely to return to a place where they feel like they are well treat, valued and appreciated, even if the price is slightly higher. But that treatment MUST be consistent. You cannot do it for awhile and then stop. Consumers are sophisticated enough to recognize the ‘flavor of the month’ service slogan, and firms that merely give lip service to the concept are quickly dismissed.
Brady Wright is a business learning solutions expert and consultant, based in Seattle
© 2011 – All rights reserved
Brady Wright is a business learning solutions expert and consultant, based in Seattle
© 2011 – All rights reserved
Brady Wright is a business learning solutions expert and consultant, based in Seattle
© 2011 – All rights reserved
© 2010 – All rights reserved